What a beta reader or proofreader looks for in a manuscript

I know handing over a manuscript that you’ve spent months or, even years, working on can be daunting. With that in mind, I thought it could be helpful for authors to see what a beta reader and proofreader looks for when working on a manuscript. I use a checklist.

If I’m beta reading:

  • Have I noted any inconsistencies or anything I’m confused by?
  • Have I explained why I find something particularly effective?
  • If I reference a scene earlier in the manuscript, have I stated the page number and explained why I’m referencing it?

If I’m proofreading:

  • Are all the character and place names spelt correctly and consistently?
  • Have I double-checked regional spellings and homophones?
  • Is the capitalisation consistent?
  • Is there a change in tense in a sentence for no reason?
  • Has a plural verb been used, mistakenly, with a singular noun or vice versa?
  • Are any ellipses spaced consistently?
  • Is any punctuation missing?
  • If a character is speaking over multiple paragraphs, are the closing speech marks placed only at the end of the last paragraph of dialogue?

This list is not exhaustive, but is a general check of the manuscript.

action beats apostrophes authors checklists clean copy dialogue tags fiction writing feedback head-hopping overthinking reading self-editing track changes tracked changes writing

Leave a comment